BENV2423: REAL TIME INTERACTIVE ENVIRONMENTS
exP_1 –EXPLOSION AND POROSITY– [20% OF FINAL COURSE GRADE]
STUDENT Melissa lattouf TUTOR
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA FROM COURSE OUTLINE_
Evidence of thought and rigor in concept development. Imagination and innovation in terms of the use of the representational instruments introduced in the tutorials. Precision and skill in each of the above areas of assessment. Students need to submit all three experiments to pass the course.
assessment criteria SPECIFIC TO THIS EXPERIMENT
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS_
Y N
yes BLOG
yes 1 X 30 SECOND CUSTOM MACHINIMA
yes 1 X 30 SECOND FOUND MACHINIMA
NOTE_ The assessment criteria from the course outline is also taken into account.. FIVE is better than FOUR – these numbers are indicative only.
THE 3 DIMENSIONAL FIELD_ Does the 3 dimensional field bring small, medium and large elements together to suggest a distinctive and significant approach to notion of Porosity? 3
THE CUSTOM MACHINIMA _ Does the Custom Machinima demonstrate a distinctive and significant approach to notions of Explosion and refiguring Porosity? 4
THE FOUND MACHINIMA_ Does the Found Machinima demonstrate a distinctive and significant approach to notions of Explosion and Porosity? 2
THE TITLES AND CAPTIONS _ Do the titles and captions make a distinctive and significant contribution to the video clips? 5
REFERENCING_ Are the video clips fully and properly referenced?
3
Comments
Grade
The custom machine was well developed and it demonstrated the experimental caption. The found machine did not really demonstrate the explination that was previously described.
1725
Monday, August 18, 2008
Marking schedule 1
BENV2423: REAL TIME INTERACTIVE ENVIRONMENTS
exP_1 –EXPLOSION AND POROSITY– [20% OF FINAL COURSE GRADE]
STUDENT Melissa Lattouf TUTOR
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA FROM COURSE OUTLINE_
Evidence of thought and rigor in concept development. Imagination and innovation in terms of the use of the representational instruments introduced in the tutorials. Precision and skill in each of the above areas of assessment. Students need to submit all three experiments to pass the course.
assessment criteria SPECIFIC TO THIS EXPERIMENT
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS_
Y N
yes BLOG
yes 1 X 30 SECOND CUSTOM MACHINIMA
yes 1 X 30 SECOND FOUND MACHINIMA
NOTE_ The assessment criteria from the course outline is also taken into account.. FIVE is better than FOUR – these numbers are indicative only.
THE 3 DIMENSIONAL FIELD_ Does the 3 dimensional field bring small, medium and large elements together to suggest a distinctive and significant approach to notion of Porosity? 4
THE CUSTOM MACHINIMA _ Does the Custom Machinima demonstrate a distinctive and significant approach to notions of Explosion and refiguring Porosity? 5
THE FOUND MACHINIMA_ Does the Found Machinima demonstrate a distinctive and significant approach to notions of Explosion and Porosity? 4
THE TITLES AND CAPTIONS _ Do the titles and captions make a distinctive and significant contribution to the video clips? 3
REFERENCING_ Are the video clips fully and properly referenced?
4
Comments
Grade
This video was well received, the camera was a bit un steady at times but other then that it was pretty good
20/25
exP_1 –EXPLOSION AND POROSITY– [20% OF FINAL COURSE GRADE]
STUDENT Melissa Lattouf TUTOR
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA FROM COURSE OUTLINE_
Evidence of thought and rigor in concept development. Imagination and innovation in terms of the use of the representational instruments introduced in the tutorials. Precision and skill in each of the above areas of assessment. Students need to submit all three experiments to pass the course.
assessment criteria SPECIFIC TO THIS EXPERIMENT
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS_
Y N
yes BLOG
yes 1 X 30 SECOND CUSTOM MACHINIMA
yes 1 X 30 SECOND FOUND MACHINIMA
NOTE_ The assessment criteria from the course outline is also taken into account.. FIVE is better than FOUR – these numbers are indicative only.
THE 3 DIMENSIONAL FIELD_ Does the 3 dimensional field bring small, medium and large elements together to suggest a distinctive and significant approach to notion of Porosity? 4
THE CUSTOM MACHINIMA _ Does the Custom Machinima demonstrate a distinctive and significant approach to notions of Explosion and refiguring Porosity? 5
THE FOUND MACHINIMA_ Does the Found Machinima demonstrate a distinctive and significant approach to notions of Explosion and Porosity? 4
THE TITLES AND CAPTIONS _ Do the titles and captions make a distinctive and significant contribution to the video clips? 3
REFERENCING_ Are the video clips fully and properly referenced?
4
Comments
Grade
This video was well received, the camera was a bit un steady at times but other then that it was pretty good
20/25
Expreriment Description
My experiment 1 is based upon the effects of change! Changes effect physical features and objects on a secondly basis. I am aiming to prove the effect upon objects with the changes against wind. I want to see how wind effects the movement of fire.
Wednesday, July 30, 2008
Depth Charge Detonation
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1flVlL4Mf8k
Upon watching this video which was seen on www.youtube.com.au. I was given a visual example of an underwater explosion which caused all kinds of havoc to the calm texture of the water whicih is visible in the first 20 seconds of the clip. After the inital explosion it is shown that there is an after effect to the detonated object underneath the water.
During this explosion there were only two eruptions that were made cleary visible by shooting hundreds of metres into the sky.
31/7/08
Melissa Lattouf
Upon watching this video which was seen on www.youtube.com.au. I was given a visual example of an underwater explosion which caused all kinds of havoc to the calm texture of the water whicih is visible in the first 20 seconds of the clip. After the inital explosion it is shown that there is an after effect to the detonated object underneath the water.
During this explosion there were only two eruptions that were made cleary visible by shooting hundreds of metres into the sky.
31/7/08
Melissa Lattouf
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)